<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Per page discussions (new threads)</title>
		<link>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/c-28532/per-page-discussions</link>
		<description>Threads in the forum category &quot;Per page discussions&quot; - This category groups discussions related to particular pages within this site.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-62381</guid>
				<title>Karma</title>
				<link>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-62381/karma</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>pieterh</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>99</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The feature is very nice. It got great feedback from people in our team. Their points for improvement were:</p> <ol> <li>It is hard to see the karma bars that are yellow and red. I'd suggest making them all green.</li> <li>The black/grey strip is distracting and looks un-pretty. I'd suggest making the green bars darker, on a transparent background.</li> <li>When you hover over the icon the large view does not say anything about the karma, it should.</li> </ol> <p>Great stuff, it's going to be useful IMO especially when we can start to filter comments by karma.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-60760</guid>
				<title>Blogging Suite</title>
				<link>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-60760/blogging-suite</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>gerdami</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3370</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>It would be interesting for the blogger to be able to</p> <ul> <li>postedit the publication date (hum, an event occured in the past but I forgot to announce it, but 3 days later I want it published on that date, not on the current editing date)</li> <li>prepare blog posts with a date in the future, i.e. when I'm going to go for holidays, I can prepare some posts that will be published in due time, while I am on the beach.</li> </ul> <hr /> <p>Indeed, I would like to be able to edit the date of regular forum posts of version 1.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-60744</guid>
				<title>ListPages Module</title>
				<link>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-60744/listpages-module</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>pieterh</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>99</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Consider instead of tagMode:</p> <p>- by default, tags are OR<br /> - use +tag to make a tag mandatory in the selection<br /> - use -tag to make a mandatory negative selection</p> <p>For category, the default should be the current category, so that if I use ListPages in the blog: category the default category is "blog:"</p> <p>To select all categories I should be able to use "*".</p> <p>For the Rss options, use consistent naming:</p> <ul> <li>rssTitle</li> <li>rssShow</li> <li>rssEmbed</li> </ul> <p>Instead of 'separate' with default 'true', use 'breaks' with default 'false'. It's not nice to have defaults that are 'true', in general a default should be 'off' until requested to be 'on'.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-59335</guid>
				<title>Templates</title>
				<link>http://dev.wikidot.org/forum/t-59335/templates</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Perry2</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>256712</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'd like to use a template for race descriptions, with content placeholders for specific fields, but I wish there was a way to have optional fields?</p> <p>E.g., <a href="http://paxrivertri.wikidot.com/smithfield-sprint">http://paxrivertri.wikidot.com/smithfield-sprint</a></p> <p>I'd like the "Series" field to be optional — some races don't have it. So I wish there was a way that the template could leave out "Series:" if the content placeholder for it is empty.</p> <p>Also, and this is just an idea out of my head, so I don't know if it is worthwhile, but maybe it would be neat if content fields could be named, i.e,<br /> ==== Series ====<br /> instead of just being numbered in order.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>